I've scanned in a small
section of
two different cards from this game. The two pictures of the cards
in the left column are the real scans
directly from my scanner. The bars to the right are samples of
colors
found in those pictures. The pictures in the right column are the
result of sending the original scan through a program (DIY here)
that
converts the picture to one that mimics what a person with Protanope
(a
form of red/green color deficit) colorblindness would see (that's me). Here's what these pictures look like to me. The 2 pictures in the top row look nearly identical to me. This makes sense since the image on the right is the image on the left transformed to make it look like what I would see. The 2 pictures in the bottom row also look nearly identical to me. The 2 pictures in the right column looks somewhat different, but not by much. The two 2 pictures in the left column look the most different, however when looking at the actual cards themselves, I couldn't tell the difference. This goes to proves that lighting conditions and even the surface reflectiveness of the object I'm looking at has a great deal to do with how I see colors. When I first looked the the cards and the scans, I had trouble distinguishing which was red and which was green. Even knowing the colors now, I am hard pressed to identify them as what I know them to be. |
5% to 8% (depending on the study you quote) of the men and 0.5% of the women of the world are born colorblind. That's as high as one out of twelve men and one out of two hundred women. I am going to limit this discussion to protans (red weak) and deutans (green weak) because they make up 99% of this group.
Scan of
Original Plate |
Deuteranope
Simulation |
Protanope
Simulation |
|
I See an "S" in this one. |
|||
Can't see anything in this
one |
|||
I see a faint "56" in this
one. |
|||
Can't see anything in this one | |||
I see a
faint "25" in this one |
|||
I see a
faint "13" in this one |
|||
Can't see anything in this one | |||
Can't see anything in this one |